White v. Commissioner of the Department of Employment & Training
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.
This is an appeal by the Department of Employment and Training (DET) from a judgment of the District Court reversing a denial of unemployment benefits to the plaintiff (employee). The employee was denied benefits on the basis of a determination that a lump sum payment to him by his former employer, Digital Equipment Corporation (Digital), was severance pay within the meaning of G. L. c. 151 A, § l(r)(3). Concluding that the lump sum payment was made to the employee in exchange for his release of Digital from any and all claims arising out of his employment and not as severance pay, we affirm…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Raytheon Co. v. Director of Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
- Bolta Products Division v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- Moore v. Digital Equipment Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Itek Corp. v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Ruzicka v. Commissioner of the Department of Employment & TrainingMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
3Cited by5 opinions
- Martha's Vineyard Land Bank Commission v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- DiCerbo v. Commissioner of the Department of Employment & TrainingMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Dicerbo v. NordbergMassachusetts Superior Court · 1998
- White v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- Wynn v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014