Legal Opinion

Merisme v. Board of Appeals on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies & Bonds

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided June 20, 1989No. 88-P-93PublishedCited by 173 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Following an automobile accident, the Commerce Insurance Company (Commerce) pursuant to G. L. c. 175, § 113B, imposed a driver merit rating surcharge against its insured, the plaintiff here, Jean T. Merisme. Merisme petitioned, under G. L. c. 175, § 113P, for review of that decision to the Board of Appeals on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies and Bonds (board). The board upheld Commerce’s imposition of the surcharge. See 211 Code Mass. Regs. § 88.12 (1986). Merisme then appealed the board’s decision to the *471Superior Court. Following an adverse decision, the plaintiff now appeals to this court.

On…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Board of Registration in PharmacyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  2. Raytheon Co. v. Director of Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. Embers of Salisbury, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. Faith Assembly of God of South Dennis & Hyannis, Inc. v. State Building Code CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
  5. Almeida v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by173 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Ass'n of Minority Law Enforcement Officers v. AbbanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  2. Coggin v. Massachusetts Parole BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  3. In re SegalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. Costa v. Fall River Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  5. City of Boston v. Outdoor Advertising BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996

168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API