Legal Opinion

Lewis v. Lipsman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 9, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the determination that she engaged in misconduct is supported by substantial evidence in the record (see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436 [1987]; Matter of Alexander v New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs., 50 AD3d 895 [2008]). Further, “[a]n administrative penalty must be upheld unless it ‘is so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness,’ thus constituting an abuse of discretion as a matter of law” (Matter of Kreisler v New York City Tr. Auth., 2 NY3d 775, 776 [2004], quoting Matter of Pell v Board…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Berenhaus v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Kreisler v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. MATTER OF ELLIS v. MahonNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Torrance v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Alexander v. New York State Office of Children & Family ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API