Legal Opinion

Torrance v. Stout

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 2008PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The judgment of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be reversed, with costs, and the petition dismissed in its entirety.

Petitioner, employed in a supervisory capacity, engaged in the willful and intentional illegal disposition of county property. Accordingly, we cannot conclude that the penalty of demotion to a nonsupervisory position shocks the judicial conscience (see Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, 233-234 [1974]). We reiterate that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rutkunas v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 2007

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. MATTER OF ELLIS v. MahonNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Kurot v. East Rock-Away Fire DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Smith v. CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Thomas v. County of RocklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Rabidou v. County of DutchessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API