Legal Opinion
First Nat. Bank of Tulsa v. Muskogee Pipe Line Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 7, 1914No. 3069PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Brror from Superior Court, Muskogee County; Farrar L. McCain, Judge. Action by the First National Bank of Tulsa against the Muskogee Pipe Line Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtLoofbourrow, J.
In April, 1910, the Tri-State Oil Company drew a customer’s draft as follows;
“Customer’s Draft. No. -. First National Bank, Tulsa. Tulsa, Okla., April 19, 1910. Pay to the order of First National Bank $1,136.42, seventeen hundred thirty-six and ?ioo dollars, with exchange, value received and charge to account of
“Tri-Statl Oil Co.,
“By J. S. Staiti, Secretary and Treasurer.
“To Muskogee Pipe Line Co., Muskogee, Okla.”
Attached thereto was the following telegram:
“Muskogee, Okla., April 19, 1910. Tri-State Oil Co., Tulsa, Oklahoma. Rechecking accounts. Owe you balance seventeen thirty-six…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ziska v. ZiskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Shawnee Light & Power Co. v. SearsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Sullivan v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885
- Conklin v. YatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Cox v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hoffer v. Eastland Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
- Iowa State Savings Bank v. City National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918