Legal Opinion
Fisk v. Department of Motor Vehicles
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 23, 1981No. Civ. 57784PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POTTER, Acting P. J.
The Department of Motor Vehicles (hereinafter DMV) appeals from a judgment mandating the DMV to set aside its decision suspending Donald Edward Fisk’s license pursuant to the implied consent statute (Veh. Code, § 13353).
Fisk was arrested by Officer Gary Blackmon of the California Highway Patrol on April 28, 1978, for driving under the influence of alcohol (Veh. Code, § 23102, subd. (a)). The arresting officer, in accordance with the implied consent statute, submitted to the DMV a written “sworn statement.” The document, entitled “Officer’s Statement, Section 13353…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Badillo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. FarraraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Wong Wing Foo v. McGrath Atty. Gen. Of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- August v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Jazayeri v. MaoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Davenport v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- People v. ZackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Imachi v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.