Legal Opinion

Highfields Capital Management L.P. v. Doe

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 18, 2005No. C04-00176MISC MMC WDPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA; DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE OBJECTION; VACATING HEARING

CHESNEY, District Judge.

Before the Court is plaintiff Highfields Capital Management L.P.’s objection to and motion for de novo review of Magistrate Judge Wayne D. Brazil’s Report and Recommendation (“Report”), filed October 28, 2004, in which Magistrate Judge Brazil recommends that the Court grant defendant John Doe’s motion, filed pursuant to Rule 45(c)(3)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to quash the subpoena plaintiff served on non-party Yahoo!. Defendant has filed opposition…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sony Music Entertainment Inc. v. Does 1-40District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  2. Columbia Insurance v. Seescandy.ComDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1999
  3. The International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio v. Winship Green Nursing CenterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. Rae v. Air-Speed, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Ravnikar v. BogojavlenskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Arista Records LLC v. John Does 1-19District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  2. Solers, Inc. v. DoeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Independent Newspapers, Inc. v. BrodieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. Krinsky v. Doe 6California Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Anonymous Online Speakers v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API