Legal Opinion

State v. Romero

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 2007No. 30,000PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOSSON, Justice.

{1} In this appeal, we are called upon to resolve a conflict between a bail bond form promulgated by this Court and a statute governing forfeiture of bail bonds. We hold that the statute controls. See NMSA 1978, § 31-3-2 (as amended through 1993). We expressly adopt the reasoning of the Court of Appeals below, State v. Romero, 2006-NMCA-126, 140 N.M. 524, 143 P.3d 763, as well as that court’s previous opinion in State v. Valles, 2004-NMCA-118, 140 N.M. 458, 143 P.3d 496. In reliance on those opinions, we need only address the conflict summarily.

BACKGROUND

{2} This appeal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. VallesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. State v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State ex rel. Torrez v. WhitakerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State ex rel. Torrez v. WhitakerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Grassie v. Roswell Hospital Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. State v. PachecoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API