Legal Opinion
Grassie v. Roswell Hospital Corp.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided April 3, 2008No. 28,050PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
{1} Eastern New Mexico Medical Center (Defendant) filed a motion in this Court seeking review of the supersedeas bond set by the district court. See Rule 12-207(B) NMRA (providing for appellate review of the district court’s ruling on a supersedeas bond). Because the purpose of the supersedeas bond is to “maintain the status quo during the pendency of the appeal,” Khalsa v. Levinson, 2003-NMCA-018, ¶7, 133 N.M. 206, 62 P.3d 297, we resolve the supersedeas bond issue by formal opinion while the merits of the underlying appeal remain pending on the general calendar.
{2}…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lovelace Medical Center v. Mendez Ex Rel. MendezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- New Mexico Board of Veterinary Medicine v. RieggerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- Albuquerque Rape Crisis Center v. BlackmerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- City of Santa Fe v. KomisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. VallesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- State Ex Rel. Children Youth & Families Department v. Arthur C.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Jones v. HARRIS NEWS, INC.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. SeiglingNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
- Grassie v. Roswell Hospital Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.