Legal Opinion
State v. Pacheco
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 12, 2008No. 27,255PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRY, Judge.
{1} Surety A-Affordable Bail Bonds (A-Affordable) appeals from a judgment of the district court forfeiting the bond that A-Affordable posted on behalf of Defendant Ismael Pacheco. A-Affordable argues that the district court (1) failed to provide notice of forfeiture as required by statute, (2) abused its discretion in ordering forfeiture of the bond, and (3) entered inconsistent findings on the relationship between A-Affordable and Amigo Bail Bonds (Amigo). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
{2} The issues in this case arise from the relationship between two bonding companies in connection…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- ITT Educational Services, Inc. v. Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. FernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. FernandezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. SotoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. AmadorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- DeMichele v. State Taxation & Revenue Dep'tNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- Connor Drummond Rice and Scott D. Rice as Co-Trustees for the 2001 Scott D. Rice Trust v. Matthew E. Malouf, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2013
- State v. NaegleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. Rodriguez-RiveraNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010