Legal Opinion

In re Nathan L.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 13, 2001No. 2000-138PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.

The juvenile, Nathan L., was charged as a delinquent with second-degree assault, RSA 631:2, 1(a) (1996), and riot, RSA 644:1, 1(a) (1996). After a bench trial in Concord District Court, the Court (Robbins, J.) acquitted the juvenile of riot but entered a finding of true on the delinquency petition, concluding that he had committed simple assault, RSA 631:2-a, 1(a) (1996), as a lesser-included offense of second-degree assault. On appeal, the juvenile argues that: (1) where neither the prosecution nor the defense requests the trier of fact to consider a lesser-included offense, the trier of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. People v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. ChamblisMichigan Supreme Court · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Holder v. Town of SandownCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  2. State v. HollyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. CoxSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  5. State v. BurkeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API