Legal Opinion

State v. Cox

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 23, 2003No. 210,2003PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice:

The defendant-appellee, Vincent Cox, was acquitted, following a jury trial in the Superior Court. The State has applied for leave to appeal, pursuant to Del.Code Ann. tit. 10, § 9903, from an adverse ruling by the Superior Court that was made during the course of Cox’s, criminal trial. The purpose of section 9903 “is to afford to the State the opportunity to have reviewed by this Court adverse rulings of law made by [trial] courts — not for the purpose of having an appellate decision in the specific case in which the question arose, but for the purpose of having the question…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Beck v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Keeble v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. People v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  5. State v. KefferWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. SpatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. Keyser v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  3. State v. GipsonArizona Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Perkins v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  5. State v. BrowerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API