Legal Opinion

Safford v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 10, 1918No. 192PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Error to the-District Court oí the United States for the Southern District of New York. Frank D. Safford was convicted of perjury, and brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

WARD, Circuit Judge.

This is one of a series of litigations arising out of a charge made by Rae Tanzer that she had been seduced under a *472promise of marriage by James W. Osborne. March 16, 1915, she began a. civil suit against him for breach of promise of marriage for damages in the sum of $50,000. March 19, James W. Osborne caused a warrant to be issued against Rae Tanzer, charging her, under section 215, United States Criminal Code (Act March 4, 1909, c. 321, § 215, 35 Stat. 1130 [Comp. St. 1916, § 10385]), with using the United States mails to execute a scheme to defraud.

Two sisters of Rae…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
  3. United States v. DunbarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
  4. United States v. GreeneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1900
  5. Hardy v. HarbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Domenico Bando, A/K/A 'Nick Bando,' Leo Telvi and Gondolfo Miranti, A/K/A 'Shiekie,'Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  2. United States v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  3. United States v. FrankelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  4. Sandroff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
  5. Goulis v. Judge of Third District CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API