Legal Opinion

United States v. Mendoza-Mendoza

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 15, 2007No. 06-5373UnpublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.

Efren Mendoza-Mendoza (“Mendoza”) was convicted for illegal reentry by a deported aUen following a conviction for an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and (b)(2), and was sentenced to 82-months’ imprisonment. He raises various claims of error pertaining to his prior Tennessee state conviction for aggravated assault: (1) that his Sixth Amendment right to jury trial was violated because the district judge, rather than a jury, determined the nature of his prior conviction; (2) that his prior conviction was invalid under Tennessee law because the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. United States v. Yervin K. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. McMurrayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. OssanaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. Terry AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. BowmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Francisco Romero-CaspetaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API