Legal Opinion
Canfield v. Canfield
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 30, 1934No. 23266PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.
This appeal involves two actions, one to set aside a will and the other to cancel a warranty deed. Both were commenced in the district court of Woodward county by Lester Canfield, Myrtle Canfield Brandt, C. V. Canfield, Bess Canfield, Ida May Canfield Van Dali and Marguerite Can-field Brucher, against Laura Canfield. The defendant is the wife of C. N. Canfield, who died testate in Woodward county May 14, 1929. The plaintiffs are the children of C. N. Canfield by two former marriages. A petition for the probate of the will of the deceased was filed in the county court of Woodward county by…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ginter v. GinterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- MacKall v. MacKallSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- McClure v. KerchnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- In Re Estates of HarknessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Kindt v. ParmenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- In Re Estate of HolcombSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- In Re Estate of McCauleyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Antle v. HartmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Tate v. MurphySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- In Re Lillie's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.