Legal Opinion
Bowen v. Hamilton
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 27, 1964No. 40390Published
1Opinion of the Court
393 P.2d 858 (1964)
William H. BOWEN, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
Sarah E. HAMILTON, Nee Bowen, and Wesley Hamilton, Defendants in Error.
No. 40390.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
May 27, 1964.
Rehearing Denied July 7, 1964.
Charles B. Tucker, James M. May, McAlester, for plaintiff in error.
R. Kay Matthews, Atoka, James Driscoll, Seminole, for defendants in error.
JACKSON, Justice.
In the trial court, plaintiff Sarah Hamilton sued her son, William Bowen, in an equitable action for the cancellation of a deed executed on October 6, 1958, which conveyed approximately 30 acres of land from the mother to the son.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Weitz v. MouldenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Canfield v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Skinner Et Ux. v. Scott Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Sporn v. HerndonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Schatz v. WintersteenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.