La Fitte v. Salisbury
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to the District .Court of Larimer County. Eon. Christian A. Bennett, Judge. Action by Marie La Fitte against Gieorge Salisbury, Henry Rups and Susan Salisbury, to have’a judgment of revival declared void, etc. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Gtabíbert
delivered the opinion of the court:
It will be noticed from the foregoing synopsis of the complaint that plaintiff does not allege that she was not duly notified of the proceedings installed by Salisbury in the district court of Pueblo county, which finally culminated in a judgment reviving the Pups judgment in his name as the assignee of Pups. True, she avers that she did not learn of the revival of the judgment, and that no assignment of the original had been made to Salisbury until in October, 1903, but that is not equivalent to stating that no process was issued and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Conway v. JohnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Venner v. Denver Union Water Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- Boldenweck v. BullisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
- Hughes v. BrewerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
3Cited by20 opinions
- Union National Bank v. LambSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Handy v. RogersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
- Tekai Corp. v. Transamerica Title Ins. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1977
- Union National Bank v. LambSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Young Mines Co., Ltd. v. SevringhausArizona Supreme Court · 1931
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.