Feick v. Hill Bread Co.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court sustaining a demurrer to an alternative writ of mandamus and ordering the issuance of a peremptory writ.

The respondent questions whether an appeal will lie on the ground that proceedings on prerogative writs are not governed by the Practice act of 1912. Pamph. L., p. 374 . This *514is a misconception. The contention of counsel is doubtless based on section 3 of that act, which provides that there shall be but one form of civil action in common law courts which shall be denominated "action at law,” but which shall not apply to proceedings on…