Siena v. Grand Lodge
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
Joseph L. Smith, J. S. C.
This is an action in lieu of a prerogative writ, and in the instant case it wonld have been a writ of mandamus. Such a proceeding is of ancient origin, having been invoked since the time of Edward the Third. It was issued by the King in accordance with his pleasure, when in those days he was supposed to have sat personally as Judge of the Court of the King’s Bench. It is a remedy clearly within the discretion of the Court.
“According to the theory of the common law, he (King) was the fountain of justice, and where the laws did not afford a remedy, and enable the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Trimble v. American Sugar Refining Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1901
- State ex rel. O'Hara v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
- Drake v. Newton Amusement Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
- In re De VengoecheaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- Maeder v. Buffalo Bill's Wild West Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1904
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Siena v. Grand Lodge, Etc., Order Sons of ItalyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951