Legal Opinion
Feist v. Joseph Dixon Crucible Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 20, 1954PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
30 N.J. Super. 153 (1954)
103 A.2d 893
MAY M. FEIST, PLAINTIFF, AND AMBROOK INDUSTRIES, INC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JOSEPH DIXON CRUCIBLE COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 15, 1954.
Decided March 20, 1954.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and CLAPP.
Mr. James P. Beggans argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents (Mr. Richard H. Hughes, on the brief; Messrs. Carpenter, Gilmour & Dwyer, attorneys).
Mr. Thomas V. Jardine argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Mr. Robert Carey, Jr., of counsel; Messrs. Carey, Schenk &…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. O'Hara v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
- Bruning v. Hoboken Printing & Publishing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
- Vernam v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Feick v. Hill Bread Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
- Feick v. Hill Bread Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Delmarmo Associates v. New Jersey Engineering & Supply Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980