Caudle v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERTSON, Presiding Judge.
Wilma Caudle (Caudle) was found guilty in a bench trial of check deception. 1 Her appeal is on two grounds. First, Caudle claims error because her motion for directed verdict was not granted. The second issue on appeal is the constitutionality of the check deception statute, in particular the prima facie or presumption provisions of the statute.
We reverse.
We need discuss only whether the motion for a directed verdict should have been granted by the trial court. A directed verdict should be granted only where there is a total lack of evidence on some essential issue…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Estep v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
- Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1962
- Huffman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
- France v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Henderson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Suits v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. GoodrichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. GoodrichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.