Huffman v. State

Appellant was indicted 1 for and convicted of violating §6 of ch. 201, Acts 1927, p. 578, §2949, Burns Ann. Ind. St. Supp. 1929 2 . He assigns as error that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for a new trial, and under Points and Authorities presents under six propositions the errors complained of, which, he contends, entitled him to have -his motion for new trial sustained.

The first of these relate to the admission in evidence over appellant’s objection, of exhibits consisting of certain certificates of deposit, certificate of deposit records, cashier’s register, remittance…