United States v. Candelaria
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
TOLIN, District Judge.
This case is now before the Court on the Court’s own motion, it having learned •of facts which indicate that modification of sentence should be considered.
Defendant pleaded Guilty in this Court to an indictment which charged robbery of a National bank with use of a deadly weapon. Although it is the custom of the Court to impose heavier sentences, Candelaria’s case appeared to require but little more than is customarily served by prisoners convicted of crimes in the Courts of California. 1
Defendant’s past life, while certainly not exemplary, 2 does show a record of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Hebert v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Houston v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- Jerome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Fox v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bartkus v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. Richard T. FordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States of America Ex Rel. Frank Esola, 53517 v. Ronald M. Groomes, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Cooper v. LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Hayes v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.