State v. Ludemann

Randall Scott Ludemann (“Defendant”) appeals his conviction after a jury trial of possession of a firearm by a felon (see section 571.070.1(1) 1), for which he received a suspended, six-year sentence. In his sole point on appeal, Defendant claims the evidence was insufficient to prove that he had actual possession of “or that he had access to or the ability to exercise control over the [firearm].” Finding no merit in the claim, we affirm.

Applicable Principles of Review

“When considering the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal, this Court must determine whether sufficient evidence permits a…