Legal Opinion

RANDALL S. LUDEMANN, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 2020No. SD36237Published

1Opinion of the Court

RANDALL S. LUDEMANN, ) ) Movant-Appellant, ) ) v. ) No. SD36237 ) STATE OF MISSOURI, ) Filed: May 14, 2020 ) Respondent-Respondent. ) APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY Honorable James K. Journey, Circuit Judge AFFIRMED After a jury found Randall S. Ludemann (“Movant”) guilty of possessing a derringer unlawfully (because he was a felon) and we affirmed the trial court’s judgment on direct appeal, Movant, acting pro se, filed a motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15. 1 Movant raises two points in this appeal claiming ineffective assistance of (1) trial counsel in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Charles K. Moore v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  3. Dorris v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  4. Storey v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
  5. Louis Edward Mallow v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API