RANDALL S. LUDEMANN, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RANDALL S. LUDEMANN, ) ) Movant-Appellant, ) ) v. ) No. SD36237 ) STATE OF MISSOURI, ) Filed: May 14, 2020 ) Respondent-Respondent. ) APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY Honorable James K. Journey, Circuit Judge AFFIRMED After a jury found Randall S. Ludemann (“Movant”) guilty of possessing a derringer unlawfully (because he was a felon) and we affirmed the trial court’s judgment on direct appeal, Movant, acting pro se, filed a motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15. 1 Movant raises two points in this appeal claiming ineffective assistance of (1) trial counsel in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Charles K. Moore v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
- Dorris v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Storey v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2005
- Louis Edward Mallow v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.