Legal Opinion

Salvado v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 22, 1981No. 942PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*306WIEAND, Judge:

This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered by the trial court in favor of the appellee insurer on the grounds that appellants’ claims for benefits under the Pennsylvania No-Fault Insurance Act were barred by the statute of limitations.

On February 29, 1976, Maria DeLuz Salvado, Stella Monteiro, Judite Monteiro and Lucretia Monteiro, a minor, were passengers in a motor vehicle operated by Etevenia Salvado and insured by the appellee, Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company. As a result of the vehicle accident occurring that day, the driver and the passengers…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. Teamsters Union Local No. 77Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Platts v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Weigand v. Allstate Ins. CompaniesHawaii Supreme Court · 1985
  3. DeSantis v. YawSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Christo v. Tuscany, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. In re the Appointment of an Arbitrator for the Dispute Between Wiegand & Allstate Insurance CompaniesHawaii Supreme Court · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API