Christo v. Tuscany, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge:
Appellants appeal from dismissal of their counterclaim and entry of summary judgment in favor of appellees. Appellants argue that their recovery of damages for an improvidently issued injunction should not be limited by the amount of the bond. We agree. They further argue their damages recoverable should reflect lost interest income. We remand for fact-finding on this issue.
This appeal represents the first opportunity for this Court to rule directly on whether Pa.R.C.P. 1531(b) insulates a plaintiff from damages in excess of the bond amount when an injunction is later found to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Delahanty v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Safeguard Mutual Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Daset Mining Corp. v. Industrial Fuels Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- College Watercolor Group, Inc. v. William H. Newbauer, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Sack v. FeinmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Walter v. StacySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Velazquez v. UPMC Bedford Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Greene County Citizens United ex rel. Cumpston v. Greene County Solid Waste AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- American Homecare Supply Mid-Atlantic LLC v. Gannon, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2009
- Elfman v. Berman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.