Legal Opinion

Bittner v. Cummings

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 14, 1992PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for malicious prosecution and/or abuse of process and fraud, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), dated October 25, 1990, as denied their motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the action is time-barred, and the plaintiff *505cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied his motion to seal the court records and to allow him to prosecute the action by use of a fictitious name.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crain Communications, Inc. v. HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Gallagher v. Directors Guild of America, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Hansen v. PetroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Rodick v. City of SchenectadyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. Rodick v. City of SchenectadyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  3. Vasile v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1998
  4. Riddell Sports Inc. v. BrooksDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  5. Kellerman v. ZenoCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API