Legal Opinion

Hassell v. Bird

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 7, 2016No. A143233PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUVOLO, P. J.—

I

INTRODUCTION

Respondents Dawn Hassell and the Hassell Law Group (Hassell) 1 obtained a judgment holding defendant Ava Bird liable for defamation and requiring her to remove defamatory reviews she posted about Hassell on Yelp.com, a Web site owned by appellant Yelp, Inc. (Yelp). The judgment also contains an order requiring Yelp to remove Bird’s defamatory reviews from its Web site (the removal order). Yelp, who was not a party in the defamation action, filed a motion to vacate the judgment which the trial court denied.

On appeal, the parties raise numerous issues relating…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Marcus v. Search Warrant of PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Heller v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Kenneth M. Zeran v. America Online, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  4. Fair Housing Coun., San Fernando v. Roommates. ComCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. People Ex Rel. Gallo v. AcunaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hassell v. BirdCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Publius v. Boyer-VineDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017
  3. Travis v. BrandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API