Legal Opinion
Supermarkets General Corp. v. Grinnell Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 10, 1974No. Nos. 172 thru 178, Dockets 73-1640-73-1643, 73-1879, 73-1883 and 73-1887PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
After the decision in United States v. Grinnell Corporation, 384 U.S. 563, 86 S.C.t. 1698, 16 L.Ed.2d 778 (1966), that Grinnell and others had engaged in unlawful monopolization of the business of providing central station protection services, many customers, including appellants (hereafter Supermarkets), and competitors commenced private treble damage actions, mostly in the District Court for the Southern District of New York. The three class actions seeking such relief, which are listed in the caption immediately below Supermarkets’ action, were brought in other districts. As a result of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,445 Alan Zients v. Willard J. Lamorte, Gertrude Aranow, Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Susie Ann Graham v. The Pennsylvania Railroad and the Washington Terminal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Nissan Motor Corporation Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- In re Prudential Securities Inc. Ltd. Partnerships LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Supermarkets General Corporation Ration v. Grinnell Corporation, City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Inc. v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Prince George Center, Inc. v. United States Gypsum Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Robinson v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.