Legal Opinion

Prince George Center, Inc. v. United States Gypsum Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 27, 1997No. 531PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge:

In this appeal we consider whether the notice procedure employed in a class action conducted in accordance with the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure was constitutionally sufficient to bind an absent plaintiff class member. We also consider whether the vigorous litigation between an absent plaintiff and the same defendants in a parallel out-of-state action requires the absent plaintiffs’ exclusion from the class of settling plaintiffs after entry of final judgment. We conclude that the notice afforded the Prudential Insurance Company of America (Prudential) satisfied the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Tracy v. County of Chester, Tax Claim BureauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Janicik v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Provident National Bank v. RooklinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Braun v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Weinberg v. Sun Company, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Rabatin v. Allied Glove Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Kelly v. SiumaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Stange, T. v. Janssen PharmaceuticalsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API