Legal Opinion

State v. Paxton

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 16, 1996No. 1 CA-CR 94-0449PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERG, Judge.

Lawrence D. Paxton (“defendant”) appeals his conviction and life sentence for first degree murder. For the following reasons, we affirm, but modify his sentence to reflect that defendant is entitled to apply for parole after the completion of twenty-five years.

FACTUAL 1 AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In December 1991, defendant was twenty years old and living in the home of his seventeen-year-old friend, Josh Smaulding, and Smaulding’s parents. He and Smaulding shared a room. Neither had a car.

At trial, Smaulding testified to the following version of events. On the morning of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. McDougall v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. JeffersArizona Supreme Court · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. DavoltArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. FlippoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In Re Jesse M.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. State of Arizona v. Matthew Thomas SnyderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API