Legal Opinion

Hand v. Catawba Power Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 28, 1911No. 8069PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Before Ernest Moore, special Judge, York, November, 1910. Action by A. S. Hand against Catawba Power Co. Defendant appeals. Messrs. Osborne, Lucas & Cocke cite: Expert evidence on the fact in issue should not be admitted: 16 Pac. 808; 32 N. E. 527; 16 N. Y. Supp. 656; 26 Eng. Com.

Read the full summary

Before Ernest Moore, special Judge, York, November, 1910. Action by A. S. Hand against Catawba Power Co. Defendant appeals. Messrs. Osborne, Lucas & Cocke cite: Expert evidence on the fact in issue should not be admitted: 16 Pac. 808; 32 N. E. 527; 16 N. Y. Supp. 656; 26 Eng. Com. L. 63; 12 Ency. 434. Nor on cause and effect: 22 S. C. 557; 36 S. C. 471; 40 S. C. 328; 65 S. C. 421; 67 S. C. 347, 419; 68 S. C. 55; 67 S. C. 181; 73 S. C, 9; 74. S. C. 102, 232; 79 S. C. 151, 250, 297; 80 S. C. 352; 81 S. C. 193; 82 S. C. 388; 84 S. C. 62; 115 N. W. 541; 17 At. 3126; 28 Pac. 966; 77 Pac. 347; 92…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

Plaintiff owns a mill and water power on Allison’s Creek, a tributary of Catawba River, which he purchased in September, 1906. In February, 1904, defendant completed a dam across the river about three miles below the mouth of the creek. Plaintiff’s mill is about four miles up the creek from the river. Defendant’s dam backs water up the river and up the creek to about two and three-quarter miles below plaintiff’s-mill. Before defendant’s dam was built, plaintiff’s water power was good, and little or no trouble was experienced by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. KirvenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Union Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  2. McLeod v. Miller & LuxNevada Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Mikulich v. CarnerNevada Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Grace v. Union Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. Knight v. Sullivan Power CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API