Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Evening Bulletin
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Mencer,
This appeal under the provisions of The.Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act1 (Act) is from the affirmance by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) of a referee’s award of benefits. The appellants, the Evening Bulletin and its insurance carrier, have argued, alternatively, that (1) the claim of Harold D. Katz (claimant) is barred for failure to give timely notice and (2) the amount of the award was excessive because the referee and Board improperly based it on the claimant’s concurrent employment. Since we reverse the Board’s order on the notice issue, we…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Canterna v. United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Padilla v. Chain Bike Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
3Cited by4 opinions
- Katz v. Evening BulletinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Gribble v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Lanzarotta v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Sheetz v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987