Legal Opinion
Norman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 25, 2001No. 1 CA-CV 01-0105PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SULT, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 In this opinion, we construe Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) § 20-1632.01 (Supp.2000), dealing with cancellation of an automobile insurance policy for nonpayment of premium, to permit an insurance company to make such cancellations effective either upon mailing of a notice of cancellation or upon a later date provided in the notice. We also hold that a notice with a postponed cancellation date may contain an option for reinstatement of the policy by payment of overdue premium without rendering the notice ineffective as a matter of law to achieve…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schecter v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Frye v. South Phoenix Volunteer Fire Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. PersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Great American Mortgage, Inc. v. Statewide InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Johnson International, Inc. v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Reynolds v. Infinity General InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Metropolitan Group Property & Casualty Insurance v. LopesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
- Branton v. Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Kevin Perry v. Peak Prop. & Cas. Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Perry v. Peak Property & Cas. Ins.District Court, D. Arizona · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.