Legal Opinion
Murray v. Minncor
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 20, 1999No. C3-99-376PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge
Appellant Kenneth Murray challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment and dismissal of his breach of contract action against respondent MINN-COR, a division of the Minnesota Department of Corrections (DOC). We affirm.
FACTS
Kenneth Murray is a state prisoner at the Minnesota Correctional Facility at Moose Lake. Murray is employed by MINNCOR, which administers an interstate commerce prison work program. Because the items manufactured by MINNCOR are sold in interstate commerce, certain terms of employment are set pursuant to the Ashurst-Sumners Act, 18 U.S.C. §§…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cederstrand v. Lutheran BrotherhoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Cummings v. KoehnenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Medica, Inc. v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- McMaster v. State of Minn.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Carlson v. LilyerdCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Weber v. HvassCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Evelyn I. Rechtzigel Trust Ex Rel. Rechtzigel v. Fidelity National Title Insurance Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Loyd v. FabianCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Steady State Imaging, LLC v. General Electric CompanyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019