Axon v. Noble Drilling Corp.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
MENTZ, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, filed by the defendant, Texaco, Inc. (“Texaco”). After reviewing the motion, memoranda of counsel, the record, and the law, this Court grants the motion for the reasons set out below.
FACTS
On June 28, 1989, the plaintiff, Elwin Axon, was injured while working on a fixed offshore drilling platform owned by defendant, Texaco. Texaco had contracted with defendant, Noble Drilling Corp. (“Noble”), whereby Noble agreed to use its drilling unit,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Entrevia v. HoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- Olsen v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Fred H. Ainsworth and Gloria Ainsworth v. Shell Offshore, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Mrs. Maria Toth Futo, Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, Intervenor-Appellant v. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dupre v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1996
- Roy v. Quality Catering, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1993