Legal Opinion
United States v. Esther Bein and William Bein
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 5, 2000No. 99-3822PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before this court on an appeal by Esther and William Bein from an order of the district court entered August 18, 1999, denying their motion to amend or alter an order entered July 9, 1999, denying in part their motion pursuant to Rule 41(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure for return of property. The Beins, alleging the Government wrongfully had destroyed or failed to return their property, filed their Rule 41(e) motion to recover compensatory damages or the return of the property. The district court granted…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Department of the Army v. Blue Fox, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Sommers Oil Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Rafael Medina v. United States of America, No. 00-2156Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Ralphael Okoro v. William CallaghanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Hammed Adeleke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Treasurer of New Jersey v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.