Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Dewinsky

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 29, 1941No. 373PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.

I. Defendants, having been convicted of conspiracy, and two of them upon other counts as well, urge several grounds in their motions for a new trial.

The reason most strenuously urged is the trial court’s failure to give instruction in the terms asked for concerning the character evidence introduced on behalf of the defendants Quick and Snover. The evidence was introduced in the usual form. The defense seasonably asked the trial court to instruct the jury in the following terms: “It is the right of a person charged with crime to have all the relevant testimony,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Edgington v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Nash v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
  3. Holmgren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. United States v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  5. Bird v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. TonerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  2. United States v. SchanermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
  3. United States v. Armando RestainoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
  4. Helen A. Davenport v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  5. State v. KerleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API