Nash v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
The guilt of the defendants is so plain that only some serious blunder in the conduct of the trial should result in a reversal. Today, under section 391 of title 28 of the U. S. Code (Jud. Code, § 269, 28 USCA § 391), we no longer assume that all errors are prejudicial, but regard the whole record with an eye to the substantial correctness of the result. Haywood v. U. S., 268 F. 795 (C. C. A. 6); Simpson v. U. S., 289 F. 188 (C. C. A. 9); Shuman v. U. S., 16 F.(2d) 457 (C. C. A. 5); Rice v. U. S., 35 F.(2d) 689, 694 (CC. A. 2). The most plausible complaint here is as to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Edgington v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Haywood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920
- Harrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Simpson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
- Amendola v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by206 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Delli Paoli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- People v. ArandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
201 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.