Bell v. Lewis
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtFelton, J.
Grounds 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the motion for new trial as amended are merely variations of the question of the manumission of the plaintiff, a minor, and will be considered here together. The evidence of the plaintiff’s manumission up to the time of the accident was uncontradicted. The father of the plain tiff swore positively and without qualification that the plaintiff had been manumitted since the age of seventeen, and that since that time the plaintiff had been allowed to work at employments of his own choosing and to retain the proceeds of his labors for his own use. This was corroborated…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Vale Royal Manufacturing Co. v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Royal v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hardy v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Odya v. QuadeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Holland v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Insurance Co. of North America v. City of DaltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973