Muir v. Murray City
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District, Salt Lake County; Wm. H. Bramel, Judge. Action by James A. Muir against Murray City. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtThurman, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover the' amount due on a certain written agreement entered into by the parties M^rch 20, 1914. The agreement provided for a loan by plaintiff to defendant in the sum of $1,200, payable in four annual installments, evidenced by four promissory notes as follows: $369 payable in one year, $334 in two years, $336 in three years, and $318 in four years. The said sum $1,200 was paid to defendant, and the notes executed in accordance with the agreement. It is alleged in the complaint that the money was used by defendant for corporate purposes. The interest on the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chapman v. County of DouglasSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- State v. Port of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Pikes Peak Power Co. v. City of Colorado SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- City of Colorado Springs v. Colorado CitySupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- City of Henderson v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- Holmes v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Wadsworth v. Santaquin CityUtah Supreme Court · 1933
- Municipal Building Authority v. LowderUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Fjeldsted v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1933
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.