Legal Opinion
Moore v. Mead Service Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 28, 1950No. 4055_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PICKETT, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover statutory treble damages alleged to have been incurred by reason of defendants’ violation of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Price Discrimination Act of 1936, 15 U.S.C.A. § 13(a). At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, the trial court dismissed the complaint and entered judgment for the defendants. This appeal is from that judgment.
The plaintiff operated the only bakery in the town of Santa Rosa, New Mexico. At the same time the defendant, Mead’s Fine Bread Company, a corporation, had a similar business…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. GriffithSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- McMullen v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Louis Voight & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Moore v. Mead's Fine Bread Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- John J. & Warren H. Graham v. Triangle Publications, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
- Trebuhs Realty Co. v. News Syndicate Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Moore v. Mead Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Myers v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.