Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Federal Reserve Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 21, 1990No. 1-89-1450PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Richard Johnson sued his employer, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (the Bank), alleging intentional infliction of emotional distress. The trial court granted the Bank’s motion to dismiss the complaint as insufficient, and on the grounds that the claim was barred by the Workers’ Compensation Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 48, par. 138.1 et seq.). For the reasons below, we reverse.

Plaintiff alleges that in May 1984, Johnson, a 14-year employee of the Bank, was instructed by his superiors to begin using unauthorized procedures to access the Bank’s computer files. The procedures compromised…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McGrath v. FaheyIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Public Finance Corp. v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Collier v. Wagner Castings Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Robertson v. Travelers Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Fregeau v. GillespieIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Travis v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Arthur Oates v. Discovery Zone, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. Graham v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. Welsh v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. Denton v. Chittenden BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API