Legal Opinion

Graham v. Commonwealth Edison Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 29, 2000No. 1-99-0345, 1-99-3441 consPublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Theis

Commonwealth Edison and David Andrews1 (ComEd) appeal from an order denying their motion to dismiss pursuant to section 2 — 615 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure (the Code) (735 ILCS 5/2 — 615 (West 1998)) on the retaliatory discharge count, which is appeal number 1 — 99—0345. James Graham (Graham) appeals from an order dismissing his intentional infliction of emotional distress count under section 2 — 615 of the Code, which is appeal number 1 — 99—3441.

Graham filed his third amended complaint against ComEd, alleging defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. McGrath v. FaheyIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Public Finance Corp. v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Fellhauer v. City of GenevaIllinois Supreme Court · 1991

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Sally Naeem v. McKesson Drug Company and Dan MontreuilCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Breneisen v. Motorola, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  3. Carl E. Thomas v. Guardsmark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Kassem v. Washington Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  5. Diane Trahanas v. Northwestern UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API