Legal Opinion

State v. Dell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 30, 1998No. CR4-0633; CA A86633PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIGGS, P. J. pro tempore.

In this criminal proceeding, defendant seeks reversal of her conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). ORS 813.010. She asserts that the trial court erred in failing to permit her to testify or be heard in her own defense, or alternatively, that the trial court erred in failing to make inquiries as to whether she wished to discharge her attorney during trial. For the following reasons, we affirm.

On March 6, 1994, defendant was pulled over for erratic driving, given field sobority tests and an Intoxilyzer test, and ultimately was charged with…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. MeyrickOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. ColeOregon Supreme Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  2. Gutale v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. State v. CrainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. State v. McReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. State v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API