Stern & Stern Associates v. Timmons
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Toal, Justice:
This appeal arises out of an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate. The appellant was awarded specific performance but denied special damages and reasonable attorney fees were limited to $3,000.00.
FACTS
Annie Mary Timmons, respondent, entered into a contract for the sale of real estate with Stern & Stern Associates [“Stern”], appellant. When Ms. Timmons refused to close on the property on the date set in the contract, Stern sued for specific performance. Stern also claimed that they suffered $135,000.00 special damages as a result of Ms.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Goodwin v. Hilton Head Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
- White v. FELKELSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
3Cited by7 opinions
- Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University v. Interactive Return Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2004
- Parker v. ShecutCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- McNaughton v. Charleston Charter School for Math & Science, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
- Norwest Props., LLC v. StreblerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- Norell Forest Products v. H & S Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.