Legal Opinion

Stern & Stern Associates v. Timmons

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 5, 1992No. 23723PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

This appeal arises out of an action for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate. The appellant was awarded specific performance but denied special damages and reasonable attorney fees were limited to $3,000.00.

FACTS

Annie Mary Timmons, respondent, entered into a contract for the sale of real estate with Stern & Stern Associates [“Stern”], appellant. When Ms. Timmons refused to close on the property on the date set in the contract, Stern sued for specific performance. Stern also claimed that they suffered $135,000.00 special damages as a result of Ms.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. Hilton Head Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  2. White v. FELKELSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University v. Interactive Return Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2004
  2. Parker v. ShecutCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  3. McNaughton v. Charleston Charter School for Math & Science, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
  4. Norwest Props., LLC v. StreblerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
  5. Norell Forest Products v. H & S Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API