Legal Opinion

Hanover Insurance Company Federal Insurance Company v. The Walt Disney Company, Defendant/cross-Claimant/appellant, and General Electric Capital Auto Lease, Inc. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. Young Eun Kang, and Jane Gootnick Jim Henson Productions, Inc., D Efendants/cross-Defendants. Hanover Insurance Company Federal Insurance Company v. Walt Disney Company, the Walt Disney Company, Defendant/cross-Claimant, and General Electric Capital Auto Lease, Inc. Young Eun Kang, and Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., and Jane Gootnick Jim Henson Productions, Inc., D Efendants/cross-Defendants

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 8, 1998No. 97-55330PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

166 F.3d 343

HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY; Federal Insurance Company,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, Defendant/Cross-Claimant/Appellant,

and

GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL AUTO LEASE, INC.; Aetna Casualty &

Surety Co.; Young Eun Kang, Defendants,

and

Jane GOOTNICK; Jim Henson Productions, Inc., D

efendants/Cross-Defendants.

HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY; Federal Insurance Company,

Plaintiffs/Appellees,

WALT DISNEY COMPANY, The Walt Disney company, Defendant/Cross-Claimant,

and

GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL AUTO LEASE, INC.; Young Eun Kang, Defendants,

and

AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY CO., Defendant/Appellant,

and

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Securities & Exchange Commission v. YunDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2001
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Hahn TruongDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2000
Biehl v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2002
Seven Resorts, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission v. TalbotDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.