Legal Opinion

Hansen v. the Bedell Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1928PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

One suffering damage as a result of concurrent acts of negligence of two or more persons, though acting disconnectedly, has a right of action against the negligent persons jointly and separately: First Sutherland on Damages, 267-269, note 4 in Section 140; Reader v. Ottis, 147 Minn. 335 (180 N. W. 117, 16 A. L. R. 463), and extended annotations beginning on page 465. A very instructive case is also found in Anderson v. McLaren, 114 Wash. 33 (194 Pac. 828). See Ahern v. Oregon Telephone Co., 24 Or. 276, 291 (33 Pac. 403, 35 Pac. 549, 22 L. R. A. 635). It seems that the court below relied on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Inv. & Ins. Co. v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Reader v. OttisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Smith v. DayOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Trickey v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Poole v. TilfordOregon Supreme Court · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Frangos v. EdmundsOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Nees v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Bill C. Harris Construction Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. Johnson v. UpdegraveOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Schassen v. Columbia Gorge Motor Coach SystemOregon Supreme Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API