Peluso v. City Taxi Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
This action was brought to recover -damages for the death of a minor son, and .the verdict and judgment were in favor of plaintiff for the sum of three thousand five hundred dollars.
[1] The evidence abundantly supports the finding that appellant’s negligence was the proximate cause of the death of the minor. Indeed, we rarely have a case wherein such affirmation can be made with equal assurance. The overwhelming weight of the evidence shows that the minor was riding slowly on a bicycle on the proper side of Eighth Street, in Sacramento. A taxi driven by an employee of appellant came from…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Slaughter v. Goldberg, Bowen & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
- Valente v. Sierra Ry. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Rice v. WhitmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Ellis v. Central California Traction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ginoza Ex Rel. Ginoza v. TakaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1955
- Burns v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Foerster v. DireitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- American Marine Paint Co. v. Nyno Line, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1924
- Wong Kit v. Crescent Creamery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.